区块链备案名单中布比唯链等9团队涉嫌发币

　　据金科社不完全统计，197个备案项目中，至少有以下9家公司疑似具有双重身份：即在国内成为了首批备案的区块链公司，同时在海外通过基金会运作等形式发行了加密数字货币。这9家公司分别为：哈希未来（北京）科技有限公司、布比（北京）网络技术有限公司、上海唯链信息科技有限公司、上海分布信息科技有限公司、杭州宇链科技有限公司、浙江超脑时空科技有限公司、广东微链科技有限公司、海南诚品区块链技术有限公司、重庆印链科技有限公司。

According to the incomplete statistics of KSK, at least nine of the 197 filing projects are suspected to have dual identities: the first listed block chain companies in the country and the distribution of encrypted digital currencies abroad, including through the operation of the Foundation. The nine companies are Hashi Future (Beijing) Technology Ltd., Bubi (Beijing) Network Technology Ltd., Shanghai Clearing Chain Information Technology Ltd., Shanghai Distributed Information Technology Ltd., Hangzhou Woos Chain Science and Technology Ltd., Zhejiang Weights and Space Technology Ltd., Guangdong Microlink Technology Co. Ltd., Henanchen Zone Chain Technology Ltd., and Science and Technology < >.

　　业内人士向金科社指出，虽然国内币圈普遍采用海外基金会的模式发币，但发币企业之前通过私募，发币和上交易所等一系列行为，已然被“币圈”投资者熟知。同样的，这些代币的创始团队成员，许多之前在宣传过程中已经大量曝光，在社交媒体或者投资群内“喊单”而遭受非议。

Industry points out to the Society that, while the domestic currency circle is generally based on the overseas foundation model, a series of actions, such as private solicitation, currency issuance, and listing, have been well known to investors in the currency ring. Similarly, the founding team members of these tokens, many of whom have been exposed in the publicity process before, have been criticized in social media or in investment groups.

　　金科社研究也发现，部分已发币企业正有意收缩在币圈的布局，甚至策划退出。譬如疑似重庆印链科技有限公司发行的INS，宣称2017年用12万资金就完成区块链底层架构设计和开发，并于当年5月完成ICO。不过据说该项目后来停掉了，目前的“INS”是一家“一个由60多名北美和欧洲人组成的专业团队，以及来自主要机构（约克大学，苏黎世联邦理工学院，普林斯顿大学）的10位领先区块链学者”。不过这家北美和欧洲人组成团队的“INS”加密数字货币上线6家数字货币交易所5家都是亚洲背景的（Bithumb、币安、okex、Kucoin、趣币网）。

The KIS study also found that some of the money-issuing companies were deliberately shrinking the layout of the currency circle, or even planning to exit. For example, INS, which is suspected of being issued by KJT, claims to have completed the design and development of the bottom structure of the block chain with $120,000 in 2017 and to have completed the ICO in May of that year. However, the project is said to have been discontinued, and the present “INS” is a “professional team of more than 60 North Americans and Europeans, as well as 10 leading sector chain scholars from key institutions (Joker University, Zurich Federal Institute of Technology, Princeton University).

　　争议：国内合规国外违规的区块链企业该被如何对待

Dispute: How does a block chain business that complies with foreign violations be treated

　　目前国内对区块链项目发展较有影响的文件有两个：一个是2017年9月4日发布的《关于防范代币发行融资风险的公告》，另外就是2019年1月10日国新办发布的《区块链信息服务管理规定》。

At present, there are two documents that have a greater impact on the development of block chain projects in the country: the Proclamation on Protection against the Risk of Money Issue Financing, issued on 4 September 2017, and the Regulation on Management of Block Chain Information Services, issued by the new State Office on 10 January 2019.

　　结合起来看两个文件，其实某些条款也符合区块链的原本精神，我们可以将文件精神作为行动纲领归结为以下7点。

When looking at the two documents together, some of the articles are in keeping with the original spirit of the block chain, and we can sum up the spirit of the document as a programme of action in the following seven points.

　　一、应当落实信息内容安全管理主体责任；

i. Main responsibility for managing information content security should be implemented;

　　二、配备与其服务相适应的技术条件；

ii. Be equipped with the technical conditions appropriate to their services;

　　三、制定和公开管理规则和平台公约；

iii. Development and disclosure of rules and platform conventions;

　　四、落实真实身份信息认证制度；

IV. Implementation of the system of authentication of genuine identity information;

　　五、不得利用区块链信息服务从事法律、行政法规禁止的活动；

Block chain information services shall not be used for activities prohibited by law or administrative regulations;

　　六、对违反法律、行政法规和服务协议的区块链信息服务使用者，应当依法依约采取处置措施；

VI. Disposal measures shall be taken in accordance with the law and in accordance with the terms of the law for users of block chain information services who violate laws, administrative regulations and service agreements;

　　七、不得通过代币的违规发售、流通和筹集其他代币。

The sale, circulation and collection of other tokens shall not be carried out through irregularities in that currency.

　　一般来说，法律法规监管措施制定会落后于行业实际情况，这就导致区块链行业普遍的架构：区块链行业从业企业把合规经营的业务放在国内，把和相关文件精神不符的业务放到海外，这也是94后大量区块链行业企业普遍采用的躲避监管的方式。

Generally speaking, regulatory and regulatory measures lag behind industry practice, which leads to the general structure of the block chain industry: firms operating in the block chain place their compliance operations in the country, and businesses operating outside the country that do not correspond to the spirit of the relevant documents. This is also the way in which firms operating in the block chain after 94 generally avoid regulation.

　　这种方式是否真正能躲避监管？

Is this really a way to escape regulation?

　　国家信息中心中经网管理中心副主任朱幼平在接受媒体采访时指出，目前发币项目有三种情况：

In an interview with the media, Chu Yingping, Deputy Director-General of the Network Management Centre of the National Information Centre, noted that there were currently three types of money distribution project:

　　第一种情况：项目原来发币了但94禁令后按照要求把币退还了，这是合规的，登记备案后，肯定能够通过以后的合规评估。

In the first case, the project had originally issued its currency but returned it as required after the 94 ban, which was in compliance and which, when registered, would certainly be able to pass subsequent compliance assessments.

　　第二种情况，原来发币项目，94禁令后出境了。这里又分为两种情况，一种是发币基金会和技术企业都搬到境外，这个境内的规定不管。虽然是中国公民的项目，要受所在国监管，也没必要登记备案。

In the second case, left the country after the 94th ban. This is divided into two other cases, namely, when both the money foundation and the technology business moved outside the country, regardless of the requirements in the country. Although a Chinese citizen's project is subject to the supervision of the country, it is not necessary to register it.

　　另一种是发币基金会搬到国外，技术支持企业仍在国内，这个有点复杂。我们认为，如果这个境外发币基金会不向境内投资者发币，境内技术支持企业只是给境外项目做技术服务。我国的政策只管到这个境内技术企业。这类企业既然登记了，按照监管逻辑，我们认为必须要证明它只是对境外基金会提供区块链技术服务，是普通商业合同，没有参与发币行为。

　　第三种情况，就是境内发币项目，这是严格禁止的。有人争辩说，发币是为了筹资做项目，没有诈骗，没有跑路。但这是不行的。94禁令说的很清楚，这一类就是违规的。因为项目没有被批准的，没有牌照，就是非法集资，是非法代币集资。

The third case of has been argued that money is issued to finance projects, without fraud and without running. But this is not possible. The 94 ban makes it clear that this category is illegal. Because the project is not approved, without license plates, it is illegal to collect funds, and it is illegal to collect money.

　　《区块链信息服务管理规定》明确规定：公司不得利用区块链信息服务从事法律、行政法规禁止的活动或者制作、复制、发布、传播法律、行政法规禁止的信息内容。而2017年9月4日《关于防范代币发行融资风险的公告》已经清清楚楚地将代币融资列为禁止项；另一方面，通过登记，名单上的公司将会得到监管机构和民众更为强烈的关注，使其更难有通过代币发售行为创造商业利润的空间。

The Block Chain Information Service Regulation specifies that: companies shall not use block chain information services for activities prohibited by law or administrative regulations or for producing, copying, publishing, disseminating and disseminating information prohibited by law or administrative regulations . The Circular of 4 September 2017 on the Protection against the Risk of Money Issue Financing has clearly included money financing as a prohibition; on the other hand, through registration, the listed companies will receive greater attention from regulatory bodies and the public, making it more difficult for them to have the space to generate commercial profits through the sale of tokens.

　　《国家互联网信息办公室关于发布第一批境内区块链信息服务备案编号的公告》对备案项目的责权意义也 有明确说明：备案仅是对主体区块链信息服务相关情况的登记，不代表对其机构、产品和服务的认可，任何机构和个人不得用于任何商业目的。

The National Internet Information Office's bulletin on the publication of the numbering of the first internal block chain information service is also clear as to the accountability of the filing project:

　　在金科社看来，国内区块链企业备案成功，仅能证明国内主体机构可以合法合规从事区块链技术开发，并非认可其海外ICO/发币行为，也不能成为、同时责任主体也应该避免成为各类币宣传机会。

In the opinion of the Society, the successful filing of domestic block chain enterprises only proves that the main domestic institutions can legally comply with the technology of block chain development, that they do not recognize their overseas ICO/currency issuances, and that they should not become, and should also be, liable for, advertising opportunities in various currencies.

　　备案制度不应该成为诸多加密数字货币眼中的“上岸”与“安全”，对于这一事件后续发展，金科社将持续关注。

The filing system should not become “ashore” and “safe” in the eyes of many encrypted digital currencies, and KIS will continue to pay attention to the follow-up to this event.

免责声明：自媒体综合提供的内容均源自自媒体，版权归原作者所有，转载请联系原作者并获许可。文章观点仅代表作者本人，不代表新浪立场。若内容涉及投资建议，仅供参考勿作为投资依据。投资有风险，入市需谨慎。

责任编辑：唐婧